Remote Work Implications on Productivity of Workers in the Saudi Financial Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1064Keywords:
Remote Work, Financial Sector, Productivity, Job Satisfaction, Management, DigitalizationAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate how remote work affects workers’ productivity in the Saudi financial sector. It tries to analyze the interrelation of workers’ productivity when working remotely with job satisfaction and work management. Moreover, the paper tries to shed light and reflect widely on the cons and pros of remote work.
Theoretical Framework: Remote work is one of the digital transformation consequences, it is a new form of work that allows workers to work away from the employer’s primary workplace. The framework of the study is adopted from the association of workers productivity with (1) working remotely, (2) job satisfaction and (3) remote work management. This framework aims to provide the magnitude of these three variables on the productivity of workers in the Saudi financial sector.
Research Methodology: Primary data collected by conducting a survey, which covers a sample consisting of 1270 respondents from banks, financial, and insurance companies in Saudi Arabia. Secondary data is obtained from previous scientific studies, official reports issued by the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA), and other related international institutions.
Findings: The Results of the descriptive and inferential analysis showed that there is a positive effect and association of workers’ productivity by job satisfaction, remote work, and work management during working remotely. As workers in the financial sector feel satisfied with their job due to remote work, their productivity increases. Analysis of remote work advantages revealed that remote work raises the sense of responsibility of staff, promoting self-censorship. Moreover, remote work contributes to balance in work and life, serenity, and enhances the psychological and physical comfort of the employee, consequently, it increases workers’ productivity. While physical isolation, lack of communication between co-workers, and low levels of learning due to limited direct contact between colleagues and clients can also challenge building social relationships at work and negatively affect the workers ‘productivity.
Research, Practical & Social implications: This study can be generalized and undertaken to improve the application of remote work as a new pattern of work in the financial sector, benefiting from its advantages and tackling its drawbacks. Moreover, design work strategies and restructure the work policies to include the remote work beside the traditional presentism work. In addition to introduce new management system compatible for remote work and specialized training programs, ensuring efficient communication to enhance employee productivity.
Originality/value: This study addresses an important contemporary issue in the field of work and productivity, remote work. It is a pioneer empirical study which focused on the linkage between remote work and workers productivity in the Saudi financial sector. It presents comprehensive conceptional framework and literature review and provides empirical results and policy implications for decision makers in the Saudi financial sector and related sectors.
Downloads
References
Akbar L, Zuk AM, Martin ID, Liberda EN, Tsuji LJS. (2021). Potential obesogenic effect of a complex contaminant mixture on Cree First Nations adults of Northern Québec, Canada. Environ Res. 192:110478.
Alasiri , N. ., & AlKubaisy , Z. . (2022). Exploring the role of leadership, work environment, it alignment and company performance on the digital transformation: a study on the private sector companies in western region, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(2), e0500. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i2.500
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., and Shockley, M. K. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing mthe status of our scientific findings. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest .16: 40–68. doi: 10.1177/1529100615593273.
Bailey, D. E., and Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new direction, and lessons from for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational behavioral 23, 383-400.
Bailyn, L. (1988). Freeing work from the constraints of location and time. New Technol Work Employ. 3, 143–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-005X.1988.tb00097.
Battiston, D., I Vidal, J. B., and Kirchmaier, T. (2017). Is Distance Dead? Face-to-Face Communication and Productivity in Teams. CEP Discussion Papers dp1473, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
Baylis, F., Darnovsky, M., Hasson., K. & Krahn, T M. (2020). Human Germline and Heritable Genome Editing: The Global Policy Landscape. The CRISPR Journal . 3: 365-377.
Beauregard, T. Alexandra and Basile, K.A. and Canónico, E. (2019) Telework: outcomes and facilitators for employees. In: Landers, R.N. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 511-543.
Bélanger, F. (1999). Workers' propensity to telecommute: an empirical study. Inf. Manag. 35, 139–153. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00091-3.
Beno, M. (2018). “Managing Telework from an Austrian Manager's Perspective,” in Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, WorldCISTS'18, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, eds Á. Rocha, H. Adeli, L. P. Reis, and S. Costanzo (Cham: Springer), 16–29. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_2.
Bloom, A. N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., and Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from homework? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment. Q J Econ. 130, 165–218. doi: 10.1093/qje/qju032.
Bloom, N., Davis, S J., and Zhestkova, Y. (2021). COVID-19 Shifted Patent Applications Toward Technologies that Support Working from Home. University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper 133,http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3695191 or https://ssrn.com/abstract=3695191.
Brueggen, A., Feichter, C., Haesebrouck, K., (2019). The effect of telecommuting on productive effort and reporting behavior. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3020221.
Cacioppo, JT., Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychol Aging. 21:140-51. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140. PMID: 16594799.
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., and Larson, B. (2019). Work-From-Anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strateg. Manag. J. 43, 655–683. doi: 10.1002/smj.3251.
Dickinson, D.L., and Villeval, M. C. (2008). “Does Monitoring Decrease Work Effort? The complementarity between Agency and Crowding-Out Theories” Games and Economic Behavior. 63:56-76.
Dubrin, A. J. (1991). Comparison of the job satisfaction and productivity of telecommuters versus in-house employees: a research note on work in progress. Psychol. Rep. 68, 1223–1234. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3c.1223.
Dutcher, E. G. (2012). The effects of telecommuting on productivity: an experimental examination. The Role of Dull and Creative Tasks. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 84, 355–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.04.009.
European Commission, (2017). An initiative to support work-life balance for working parents and carers, COM (2017) 252 final. Brussels.
Gajendran, R.S., and Harrison. D. A. (2007). The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown about Telecommuting: Meta-Analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 92: 1524 –1541.
Galanti T, Guidetti G, Mazzei E, Zappalà S, Toscano F (2021). Work From Home During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Impact on Workers’ Remote Work Productivity, Engagement, and Stress. J Occup Environ Med. 1;63(7): e426-e432. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236. PMID: 33883531; PMCID: PMC8247534.
Gambardella, A., Panico, C., and Valentini, G. (2015). Strategic incentives to human capital. Strateg. Manag. 36, 37–52. doi: 10.1002/smj.2200.
Hill, E. J., Miller, B. C., Weiner, S. P., and Colihan, J. (1998). Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Pers. Psychol. 51: 667–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570. 1998.tb00256. x.
Iazzolino, G., and Laise, D. (2018). Knowledge worker productivity: Is it really impossible to measure it? Meas. Business Excell. 22, 346–361. doi: 10.1108/MBE-06-2018-0035.
ILO (2020). An Employer's Guide on Working from Home in Response to the Outbreak of COVID-19. Available online at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_dialogue/—act_emp/documents/publication/wcms_745024.pdf.
ILO (2020. Teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond A practical guide Geneva: International Labour Office.
Jayamaha, A., and Mula, J. M. (2011). Productivity and efficiency measurement techniques: identifying the efficacy of techniques for financial institutions in developing countries. J. Emerg. Trends Econ. Manag. Sci. 2, 454–460.
Jex, S. M., and Britt, T. W. (2014). Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Laihonen, H., Jääskeläinen, A., Lönnqvist, A., and Ruostela, J. (2012). Measuring the productivity impacts of new ways of working. J. Facil. Manag. 10, 102–113. doi: 10.1108/14725961211218749.
Lemieux, T., Milligan, K., Schirle. T and Skuterud. M. (2020) Initial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Canadian labour market. Canadian Labour Economics Forum. Working paper series.
MartÌnez-Sanchez, A., PÈrez-PÈrez, M., Vela-JimÈnez, M.J., de-Luis-Carnicer, P., (2008). Tele-work adoption, change management, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21, 7-31.
Mas, A., and Moretti. E. (2009). "Peers at Work." American Economic Review, 99: 112-45.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2016). Digital globalization: The new era of global flows., March.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2017). The new dynamics of financial globalization., August.
Meyer, C. S., Mukerjee, S., Sestero, A., (2001). Work-family benefits: which ones maximize profits? Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 28-44.
Michal., B and Hvorecky. J. (2021) Data on Austrian Company's Productivity in the Pre-Covid-19 Era, During the Lockdown and After Ist Easing: To Work Remotely or Not? Frontiers in Communication, Laussane, Frontiers Media SA 6.
Monteiro, N. P., Straume, O. R., and Valente, M. (2019). Does Remote Work Improve or Impair Firm Labour Productivity? Longitudinal Evidence from Portugal. https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/62137/1/NIPE_WP_14_2019.pdf .
Neeley, T. (2020). 15 Questions About Remote Work, Answered. [Online] Harvard Business Review. www.hbr.org/2020/03/15-questions-about-remote-work-answered.
OECD. (2020). Productivity. Available on line at https:// www.oecd-ilibraray.org/economics/productivity/indicator-group/english_0bb009ec-en.
Olson, M. H. (1989). Work at home for computer professionals: current attitudes and future prospects. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 7, 317–338. doi: 10.1145/76158.76891.
O'Neill, T. A., Hambley, L. A., Greidanus, N. S., MacDonnell, R., & Kline, T. J. (2009). Predicting teleworker success: An exploration of personality, motivational, situational, and job characteristics. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24, 144-62.
Ozcelik, H., & Barsade, S. (2018). No Employee an Island: Workplace Loneliness and Job Performance. A
Palvalin, M. (2019). Knowledge Work Performance Measurement in the New Ways of Working Context. Ph.D. diss. Tampere University.: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/250166693.pdf.
Wheatley, D. (2017). Employee satisfaction and use of flexible working arrangements. Work, Employment and Society. 31:567-585. doi:10.1177/0950017016631447.
Susanto, Y., Gunadi, Wicaksono, A., Murliasari , R., & Sampe , F. (2022). Employee Performance Analysis Along Work from Home During the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(6), e0459. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i6.e459
WHO (2020)? WHO Director-General's Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hiyam Abdulrahim, Ghadda Yousif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
