Multinational Corporation, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability-Oriented Innovation, Survey


Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between Sustainability-Oriented Innovation (SOI) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Brazilian multinationals.


Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework provides relevant information on CSR and SOI, which forms the basis for the development of hypotheses.


Method: To collect data, an e-survey was conducted with Brazilian multinationals operating in various industries and segments, resulting in 60 valid questionnaires. The data was analyzed through multivariate analysis, employing canonical correlation and multiple linear regression procedures.


Results and Discussion: The results of the multivariate analysis empirically supported five hypotheses (h1, h2, h3, h4, and h5). However, the results did not support the hypothesis that predicted a positive correlation between SOI practices and CSR as a differentiation strategy.


Research Implications: The practical and theoretical implications of this research are significant, particularly in shedding light on emerging market multinationals, with a specific focus on Brazilian companies. By specifically examining Brazilian multinationals, this research fills a crucial gap in the literature, offering insights into the unique challenges and opportunities faced by firms from an emerging market like Brazil.


Originality/Value: The findings of this study provide valuable guidance for Brazilian multinational corporations seeking to enhance their CSR initiatives and SOI practices. By understanding the relationships between CSR, SOI, and other key variables, these companies can develop more effective strategies to navigate global markets while simultaneously addressing social and environmental concerns.


Download data is not yet available.


Ako, R. (2014). Corporate social responsibility of multinational corporations in developing countries: perspectives on anti-corruption. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 30(78).

Aligleri, L., Aligleri, L. A., & Kruglianskas, I. (2009). Gestão socioambiental: responsabilidade e sustentabilidade do negócio. São Paulo, SP: Atlas.

Babbie, E. (2001). Métodos de pesquisa de survey. Belo Horizonte, MG: Editora UFMG.

Barbieri, J.C. (2007). Gestão empresarial ambiental: conceitos, modelos e instrumentos (2nd ed.) São Paulo, SP: Saraiva.

Bertoncello, S. L. T., & Chang Jr, J. (2007). A importância da Responsabilidade Social Corporativa como fator de diferenciação. FACOM, (17), 70-76.

Boehe, D. M., & Cruz, L. B. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, product differentiation strategy and export performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 325-346.

Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., & Wagner, M. (2013). Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 1-8.

Borini, F. M., Fleury, M. T. L., Fleury, A. C. C., & Oliveira Jr, M. M. (2010). Performance e internacionalização das empresas brasileiras. In M. M. Oliveira Jr (Org.), Multinacionais brasileiras: internacionalização, inovação e estratégia global (pp. 111-126). Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman.

Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways: an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.

Carroll, A.B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105

Casanova, L. (2015). Global Latinas in search of a second wind. Latin Trade, 23(1), 50-50.

Casanova, L., & Dumas, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and Latin American multinationals: is poverty a business issue? Universia Business Review, (25), 132-145.

Casanova, L., & Fraser, M. (2009). Introduction. In From multilatinas to global Latinas: the new Latin American multinationals (pp. 1-29). IDB Publications (Books).

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Cochran, P. L. (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50, 449-454.

Cyrino, A. B., & Tanure, B. (2009). Trajetórias das multinacionais brasileiras: lidando com obstáculos, desafios e oportunidades no processo de internacionalização. In J. Ramsey, & A. Almeida (Orgs.). A ascensão das multinacionais brasileiras: o grande salto de pesos-pesados regionais a verdadeiras multinacionais (pp. v-vi). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Elsevier.

Drucker, P. F. (1969). Uma era de descontinuidade. São Paulo, SP: Círculo do Livro.

Fleury, F., Fleury, M. T. L. (2014). Brazilian Companies in their habitat: the impacts of pro-market reforms in their evolution and internationalization. In C. Pattnaik, & V. Kumar (Eds.). Emerging Market Firms in the Global Economy (pp. 207-229), 15. Available at

Fleury, A., & Fleury, M. T. L. Internacionalização de empresas brasileiras: em busca de uma abordagem teórica para os late movers. In A. Fleury, & M. T. L. Fleury (Orgs.). Internacionalização e os países emergentes. São Paulo, SP: Atlas, 2007.

Forbes. (2016a). The world’s most sustainable companies 2016. [ONLINE] Available at [Accessed 22 November 2016].

Forbes. (2016b). Forbes global 2000 companies per country. [ONLINE] Available at [Accessed 20 November 2016].

Franceschini, S., Faria, L. G. D., & Jurowetzki, R. (2016). Unveiling scientific communities about sustainability and innovation: a bibliometric journey around sustainable terms. Journal of Cleaner Production 127, 72-83.

Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine. [ONLINE] Available at [Accessed 12 August 2016].

Gonçalves-Dias, S. L. F., & Teodósio, A. S. S. (2011). Perspectivas de análise do ambientalismo empresarial para além de demonizações e santificações. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 5(2), 3-17.

Griffiths, A., & Wall, S. (Eds.). (2012). Applied economics (12th ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.

Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados (6th ed.). Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman.

Hansen, E. G., Grosse-Dunker, F., & Reichwald, R. (2009). Sustainability innovation cube: a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(04), 683-713.

Iñigo, E. A., & Albareda, L. (2016). Understanding sustainable innovation as a complex adaptive system: a systemic approach to the firm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 1-20.

Jay, J., & Gerard, M. (2015). Accelerating the theory and practice of sustainability-oriented innovation. MIT Sloan School Working Paper Series 5148-15.

Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E.G. (2011). Sustainability-oriented innovation in SMEs: a systematic literature review of existing practices and actors involved. Paper presented at XXII International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM) Conference. Hamburg, Germany.

Lassere, P. (2012). Global strategic management (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Losada-Otálora, M., & Casanova, L. (2014). Internationalization of emerging multinationals: the Latin American case. European Business Review, 26(6), 588-602.

Melo, P. (2009). Prefácio. In J. Ramsey, & A. Almeida (Orgs.). A ascensão das multinacionais brasileiras: o grande salto de pesos-pesados regionais a verdadeiras multinacionais (pp. V-VI). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Elsevier.

Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 15 (September), 57-64.

OECD. 2011. Diretrizes da OCDE para as empresas multinacionais. [ONLINE] Available at: [Accessed 11 January 2017].

Pattnaik, C., & Kumar, V. (2014). Emerging market firms in the global economy: an overview. In C. Pattnaik & V. Kumar (Eds.). Emerging Market Firms in the Global Economy (pp. XV-XXII), 15. Available at

Pinto, K.; Oliveira Jr, M.; Borini, F. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: a study of Brazilian subsidiaries. African Journal of Business Management, 7(6), 405-423.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-58.

Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. v. d. (1995, Sep/Oct) Green and Competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 120-134.

Ramamurti, R. (2012). Competing with emerging market multinationals. Business Horizons, 55(3), 241-249.

Rathert, N. (2016). Strategies of legitimation: MNEs and the adoption of CSR in response to host-country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies 47(7), 858-879.

Roscoe, S., Cousins, P. D., & Lamming, R. C. (2016). Developing eco-innovations: a three-stage typology of supply networks. Journal of Cleaner Production 112, 1948-1959.

Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (2006). Metodologia de Pesquisa (3rd ed.). São Paulo, SP: McGraw-Hill.

Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers.Sousa, A. C. A. (2008). A evolução da política ambiental no Brasil do século XX. [ONLINE] Available at [Accessed 12 October 2016].

Veiga, J. E. (2005). O principal desafio do século XXI. Ciência e Cultura, 57(2), 4-5.

Welford, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: the next agenda? In P. Dobers (Ed.). Corporate Social Responsibility: challenges and practices (pp. 309-322). Stockholm: Santérus Academic Press Sweden.

World Bank. (2016). Databank. [ONLINE] Available at

data/home.aspx. [Accessed 19 January 2017].




How to Cite

Pinto, K. E. F., Oliveira Junior, M. M., & Fernandes, C. C. (2024). SUSTAINABILITY-ORIENTED INNOVATION AND CSR: A QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH IN BRAZILIAN MULTINATIONALS. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(4), e04497.