Stress Management and Employee Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i11.4008Keywords:
Stress, Stress Management, Stressor, Employee Performance, WorkplaceAbstract
Purpose: This study investigated the extend at which stress has affected the performance of staff in organization setting. It addressed how performance can be improved upon for effective service delivery. Improving the performance of employees working within an organization has received attention in different contexts. This occurs because for an organization to achieve high performance, the contributions of its employees matter a lot to achieve their goals. For any organization to achieve its essence, it must have acquired the right calibre of employees and managed them properly. Is at the instance of this that this study was carried out to address how improved performance can be recorded and how stress can be properly managed for effective service delivery.
Theoretical framework: The aim of stress management is to ensure effective performance of staff in organization and to meet the aim of the organization and deliver services effectively. Several concepts, such as: stress, stressors, signs, symptoms and sources, stress management, stress management practice and employee performance were reviewed to align with the direction of the study. The focus is to see to how personnel in organization can perform effectively, be able to manage stress. Factors causing stress were studied and addressed.
Methodology/Design/Approach: This study which is descriptively adopted the survey research method. The study was carried out at a private university in southwest Nigeria. The population of this study comprised all the non-academic staff in the university. Two hundred and eighty (280) non-academic staff of the University participated in the survey. The questionnaire was the instrument for data collection in this research. Inferential and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data that had been obtained.
Findings: The study finding revealed that stress has a significant impact on employee performance. The outcome also showed a substantial correlation between employees' performance and personal stress management strategies. This suggests that personal stress management strategies should be encouraged because they are linked to workers' productivity. The findings suggest that its contribution to employee performance is minimal perhaps because individuals do not adopt these techniques of stress management.
Research, Practical & Social implications: The study concentrate on how stress can be well managed in organization because of the ill stress has caused in the performance of organization. It has also been established that there are two techniques namely individual and organisational approaches to stress management.
Originality/value: The study added value to body of knowledge because its outcome showed that without effective stress management strategies, organization can not meet up with its optimization level in terms service delivery and achieving the goals of the organization. The individual techniques of stress management were found to have a significant role to play in suppressing employee poor performance while the organizational stress management techniques provide organizational support for employees to improve their performance on the job. This study established that effective stress management among non-academics of Bowen University would improve their performance on the job. The study as recommends that Management should redefine the stress management policy of the University to address gaps in it and make it more robust.
Downloads
References
Auerbach, S. & Grambling, S. E., (2003). Stress psychology. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill Book Company. Churchill: Living Stone.
Bridsky, C. (1982). Work stress in correctional institutions. Journal of Prison and Jail Health2, 75-101.
Byer, O. C. & Shainbey, N. J. (1991). Living well. Health in your hands, Sun Antomio Harpe, Collins Publishers.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884.
Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (5), 822-834.
Enyonam P. A., Opoku, A. G., Addai K. E., & Batola, D. (2017). The Effect of Occupational Stress on Job Performance at Aspet A. Company limited. Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK, Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Vol.5, No.8, pp.1-17, September ISSN: 2052- 6350.
Abdelhay, S., Abdulrahim, H., & Marie, A. (2023). Employees Performance as affected by Monetary and Psychological Incentives (the Field of Study the Commercial Banksin UAE). A Comprehensive Study. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 8 (7). 01 - 024.
Ifegwazi, M. C. (2005). Stress in religious communities. In B.N Ezeilo (Ed), Family Stress Management (Pp 85-103). Enugu: Snaap Press Limited.
Inuwa, M. (2016). Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance: An Empirical Approach. The Millennium University Journal, 1(1), 90.
J. J. van der Klink, R. W. Blonk, A. H. Schene, & F. J. H. van Dijk, (2001 ). “The benefits of interventions for work-related stress,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 270–276,.
Jayakumar, A. & Sumathi, K. (2014). “An Empirical Study on Stress Management” for Higher Secondary Students in Salem District-Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Recent Advances in Organizational Behaviour and Decision Sciences (IJRAOB). An Online International Monthly Journal (ISSN: 2311-3197) 2014 Vol 1.
Kinicki, A. & Kreitner, R. (2007), Organizational Behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual's fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person group, and per supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
Mohammed A. M. & Abdullahi Y. B. (2011). An Evaluation of Staff Motivation, Dissatisfaction and Job Performance In An Academic Setting.
Morris, C. G. (1990). Contemporary psychology and effective behaviour (7thed.). Glenview. South Foresman Press.
Nabi, N. M, Foysol, K. M., & Adnan, S. M. (2017). The Empirical Study on Human Resource Management Practices with Special Reference to Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover at Investment Corporation of Bangladesh.
Nawaz, A. & Muhammad, A. “The Impact of Occupational Stress on University Employees’ Personality” Institute of Business Management, Karachi [email protected]
Nnamani, M. N. (2001). Stressor and Stress Coping Mechanisms of Students of Enugu State, University of Science and Technology, Nigeria. School Health Journal, (1), 18-25.
Obi, E. (2003). Educational management, Theory and practice. Enugu: JAMOE Enterprises (Nig).
Onuzulike, N. M. (2002). The issue in health. Owerri: Mc Williams Publishers.
Onuzulike, N. M. (2006). Issues in health (3rded.) Owerri: Mega Soft Publishers.
Pradhan, R. K. & Jena, L. K. (2017). Employee Performance at Workplace: Conceptual Model and Empirical Validation.
Pritchard, M., Elison-Bowers, P., & Birdsall, B. (2010). Impact of integrative restoration (iRest) meditation on perceived stress levels in multiple sclerosis and cancer outpatients. Stress & Health. 26(3):233-237. doi:10.1002/smi.1290.
Robbins, P. S. (2004). Organizational behaviour, Prentice Hall pub. Ed. 9th, 2004, 563
Soegoto, E. S. & Narimawati, U. (2017). “The Contribution of Stress Management and Good Employee Performance Towards the Success of a Company”
Watson, R. & Fawcell, T. (2003). Pathophysiology homeostasis and nursing. London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html