Leadership and Diplomacy as Effective Tools for Advancing the Principles of Good Governance and Sustainable Economic Development: A Comparative Examination of Nigeria and Rwanda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i11.3954Keywords:
Leadership, Diplomacy, Good Governance, Management, Sustainable Economic DevelopmentAbstract
Objective: This paper aims to analyze the effect of leadership and diplomacy on the good governance and sustainable economic development of Nigeria and Rwanda. The study will focus on the various leadership strategies and capacity-building diplomacy, social welfare diplomacy, and poverty alleviation diplomacy that contribute to good governance and sustainable economic development in these countries. The findings of this research will help to understand the role of leadership and diplomacy in achieving good governance and sustainable economic development in developing countries like Nigeria and Rwanda.
Theoretical Framework: The Transformational Leadership Theory proposed by James MacGregor Burns (1978) and Bernard M. Bass (1985) promotes the adoption of a sustainability mindset, prioritizing sustainability considerations over immediate needs and the Contingency Theory of Leadership by Austrian psychologist Fred E. Fiedler (1960) that focuses on identifying specific environmental variables that can determine the most appropriate leadership strategy for a given situation support this article.
Method: The research strategy employed in this study was a descriptive survey with 114 (57 from Nigeria and 57 from Rwanda) drawn from ministries of Foreign Affairs using a purposeful and simple random selection approach. The sample size was determined using Slovin's method, n= N/ (1 + Ne2) with N=68 and an acceptable margin of error of e=0.05 for each sample group. Questionnaires were used for data collection, and a CVR value of (1), indicating a high level of validity for the instrument, was acquired through the application of Lawshe’s method, while the homogeneity of the instrument was determined by employing the Kudar-Richardson procedure (KR-21) with r-coefficient score of .79, confirmed the dependability of the questionnaire. The data gathered was analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, mean and standard deviation and paired sample t-tests with a significance level set at p < .05 were used for statistical significance.
Findings: The study's findings suggest that the participants from Rwanda had a greater appreciation for the importance of leadership strategies and diplomatic approaches in advancing good governance, sustainable economic development, capacity building, social welfare, and poverty reduction than their Nigerian counterparts. The statistical analysis demonstrated that this disparity was statistically significant at a confidence level of p < .05. Thus, it can be inferred that the effectiveness of leadership and diplomatic approaches depends on the specific country context. Ultimately, these results underscore the critical role of effective leadership and diplomacy in achieving good governance and sustainable economic development.
Conclusion: It is imperative to acknowledge that a substantial portion of the programs encompassing the three dimensions of good governance and sustainable economic development has been duly executed. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that the sustainability of these programs is often compromised due to several factors such as corruption, insecurity, institutional deterioration, and negative public perception.
Downloads
References
Adogamhe, P. (2016). Nigeria’s Diplomacy: The Challenges of Regional Power and Leadership in a Globalizing World. In book: Diplomatic Strategies of Nations in the Global South (213-238)
Akpe, A. (2008). Corruption, Poverty, Still High in Nigeria- NEPAD Team. Retrieved online on 29 September 2023 at: http:www.businessdayonline.com/national/10725.html
Bardhan, P. (2005). Scarcity, conflicts and cooperation essays in the political and institutional economic development, Cambridge: The MIT Press. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 6 (1); 48
Bass, B., M. (1985) Model of transformational leadership. In T.F. Mech & G.B. McCabe (Eds.), leadership and academic librarians. Westport, CT: Greenwood
Bello, M., L. & Lamidi, K., O. (2009). An assessment of poverty as a threat to Nigerian fledging democracy. Lapai International Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2 (2); 380-389
Borcan, K., (2010). Diplomacy and cosmopolitanism in a globalized world. Journal of International and Global Studies. 4 (1); 33-40
Burns, J., M. (1978) Leadership. New York. Harper & Row.
Claude, A. (1996). Democracy and development in Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 35, (4), 745-778.
Chen, E. & Chen, L. (2017). Exploration of targeted poverty alleviation in poverty-stricken areas from the perspective of ICT. Journal of China Educational Technology, (3); 58-62.
Constantinou, C. (2013). “Between statecraft and humanism: diplomacy and its forms of knowledge.” International Studies Review 15(2); 141–162
Eban, Abba (1983). The New Diplomacy. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson
Economic Commission for Africa (2009), The Role of Parliament in Promoting Good Governance, Governance and Public Administration Division (GPAD)
Ejuvbekpokpo, S. (2012). Cost of governance on economic development in Nigeria. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(13);19–24.
Fisher, R. & Brown, S. (1988). Getting together: Building a relationship that gets to yes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
Folarin, S. (2010) “National role conceptions and Nigeria’s African Policy (1985-2007)”. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Ota: Covenant University.
Frieder, F., E. (1960). The contengency leadership theory. Retrieved online on 26th September, 2023:https://mmhapu.ac.in/doc/eContent/Management/ShahnazMadam/Contingency%20Theory.pdf
Glenn, P. and L. Susskind (2010). “How Talk Works: Studying Negotiation Interaction.” Negotiation Journal 26 (2); 117–123.
Ika, L., & Donnelly, J. (2019). Under what circumstances does capacity building work?. In capacity building in developing and emerging countries. Springer, Cham.
Ikubaje, J., G. (2014). Democracy and anti-corruption in Africa. Department of Political Affairs, African Union Commission. Retrieved online on the 26 september, 2023 at: http://www.africansharedvalues.org/en
Iyoha, F., O., Gberevbie, D., F., Iruonagbe, C., T., & Egharevba, M., E. (2015). Cost of governance in Nigeria: In whose interest?. International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering. 9, (1); 245-252
Jönsson, C. and M. Hall (2005). Essence of diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Kaufmann D., Kraay, A. & Zoido, L., P. (2000). Governance matters: From Measurementto action. IMF Finance and Development. 37, (2).
Kelman, Herbert C. (1996). “Negotiation as Interactive Problem Solving.” International Negotiation 1(1); 99–123.
Lewis, C., M., & Lloyd-Sherlock, P. (2009). Social policy and economic development in South America: An historical approach to social insurance. Economy and Society, 38(1), 109-131.
Magoma, S., M. (2019). The Significant role of Tanzania's diplomacy towards economic Development. Upblushed master of public management thesis, KDI School.
Meerts, Paul, W. (2015). Diplomatic negotiation: Essence and evolution. The Hague: Clingendael Institute.
Mkhabela, M., K. (2013). South African foreign policy in Africa: The case of South African retail multinational corporations. Unplished master degree thesis: University of South Africa, Pretoria.
Pouliot, V. & Cornut, J. (2015). “Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A Research Agenda.” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3); 297–315.
Murray, S., Sharp, P., Wiseman, G., Criekemans, D., & Melissen, J. (2011). The present and future of diplomacy and diplomatic studies. International Studies Review, 13(4); 709-728.
Nicholas, O., O., S., Kehinde, O., J., Imhonopi, D. and Evbuoma, I., K. (2016). Good governance and leadership: Pathway to sustainable national development in Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration and Governance 6 (1); 35-49
Nnablife, N. K. E. (2010). Defining and enforcing ethical leadership in Nigeria. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 1(1), 25-41.
Nyewusira, V., & Nweke. (2014). Nigeria and the attainment of sustainable development in the 21st century. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 5(4); 645-655.
Okoth, A., J. (2012). Economic diplomacy: Dimensions and implications. Unpublished master degree thesis in International Studies. Institute of diplomacy and international studies. University Of Nairobi.
Ologbenla, D., K. (2007). Leadership, governance and corruption in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa. 9(3); 97-118.
Omrani, T., Chegrani, M., Tahri, S. (2023) Funding deficit pension system: Structural reforms that necessarily involve partial privatization of pensions in Algeria. International Journal of Professional Business Review 8 (10); 1-24
Shobola, A., A., & Nicholas-Omoregbe, O., S. (2012). A Nigerian personality: Panacea for African leadership. Africa Leadership Review,UK, 4; 137-157
Sofer, Sasson (1988). Old and new diplomacy: A debate revisited. Review of International Studies 14 (3); 195–211.
Uwera, D., & Munene, P. (2021). Diplomacy promotion and economic development in Rwanda. A case of United States Embassy Kigali. Journal of Advance Research in Social Science & Humanities. 7 (10); 13-25
Wang, D. (2006). The Austrian and Swiss welfare state system in international comparison Journal of Societal and Social Policy, 5 (2); 25-49
Watson, A. (1982). Diplomacy: The dialogue between states. London: Eyre Methuen Ltd.
Yalokwu, P., O. (2006). Fundamentals of management; second edition. African Centre for Management and Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lloyd Chukwuemeka Nwafor, Geoffrey Ijomah David Chima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
