What do we know about barriers to knowledge transfer? A bibliometric study on internal stickiness
Keywords:Internal Stickiness, Knowledge Transfer, Bibliometric review
Objective of the study: to identify the intellectual structure of research on Internal Stickiness (IS) from the references existing in publications on this topic.
Methodology / Approach: a bibliometric analysis of quotation and quotation was used, as well as a network analysis. The sample, after worked and free of articles that were not part of the theme, was composed of 152 articles from 1994 to 2018.
Originality / Relevance: The transfer of knowledge and best practices among members of the organization has attracted considerations from academia and organizations, because the company's competitiveness is directly linked to the knowledge acquired and its sharing. The difficulty of transferring knowledge and best practices in organizations is represented by the term Internal Stickiness (IS).
Main results: three fields were identified that guide research on (IS): Knowledge Transfer; Knowledge transfer as a positive factor for the organization; Knowledge Transfer and Strategic Innovation.
Theoretical / methodological contributions: it was possible to identify that there was no review article on the topic (IS). So, this study was able to contribute with the theory and show the existing works that had a greater influence on (IS).
Social / management contributions: it is noticed that the existing articles deal with (IS) as the difficulty of knowledge transfer. With this, this study can also contribute to the practice of knowledge transfer, mainly because this theme is related to the development of competitive advantage in companies.Keywords: Internal Stickiness; Knowledge Transfer; Bibliometric.
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource-based theory: dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 621–636. doi: 10.1002/smj.532
Adler, P. S. (1990). Shared Learning. Management Science, 36(8), 938–957. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.36.8.938
Akbar, H. (2003). Knowledge Levels and their Transformation: Towards the Integration of Knowledge Creation and Individual Learning*. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 1997–2021. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00409.x
Andrews, K. M., & Delahaye, B. L. (2000). Influences on Knowledge processes In Organizational Learning: The Psychosocial Filter. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 797–810. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00204
Argote L (2012) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer Science and Business Media, New York).
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.571.14424
Balm, G. J. (1992). Benchmarking: A Practitioner's Guide for Becoming and Staying Best of the Best.' QPMA Press, Schaumberg, IL.
Baloff, N. (1970). Startup management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-17(4), 132–141. doi: 10.1109/TEM.1970.6448538
Barney, J., (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17(1), 99-120.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Harvard Business School Press.
Berger, P. L. and T. Luckman (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge Transfer In International Acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (3), 439-462.
Buttolph, D. (1992). A New Look at Adaptation. Knowledge, 13(4), 460–470. doi: 10.1177/107554709201300405
Chew, W. 8. (1991). 'Productivity, investment and Murphy's law', Harvard Business School, working paper, pp. 91-059.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. doi: 10.2307/2393553
Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B.-S. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1–2), 39–68. doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00004-3
Das, A., & Chakraborty, S. (2018). KNOWLEDGE WITHHOLDING WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION: THE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESISTANCE TO KNOWLEDGE SHARING LINKING WITH TERRITORIALITY. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability. RISUS ISSN 2179-3565, 9, 94. doi: 10.24212/2179-3565.2018v9i3p94-108
Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Massachusetts.
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532. doi: 10.2307/258557
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. 28.
Galbraith, C. S. (1990). Transferring Core Manufacturing Technologies in High-Technology Firms. California Management Review, 32(4), 56–70. doi: 10.2307/41166628
Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23–30. doi: 10.1108/13673270210417664
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17 109–122.
Guerrazzi, L. A. de C., Brandão, M. M., Junior, H. de C., & Lourenço, C. E. (2015). Pesquisa em Marketing e Estratégia nos Principais Periódicos Internacionais: Um Estudo Bibliométrico sobre Publicações no Século XXI. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 14(01), 07–27. doi: 10.5585/riae.v14i1.2200
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496. Retrieved December 18, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094239
Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1) 82–111.
Hayes, R. H. and K. B. Clark (1985). Exploring the Sources of Productivity Differences at the Factory Level. Wiley, New York.
Jasimuddin, S. M. (2007). Exploring knowledge transfer mechanisms: The case of a UK-based group within a high-tech global corporation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(4), 294–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.03.003
Jensen, R., & Szulanski, G. (2004). Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 508–523. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400107
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONALBUSINESS STUDIES, 24 (4), 625-645.
Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308. doi: 10.2307/259084
Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal. 19:461-477.
Leonard-Barton, D. A., W. B. Chew, & R. Bohn. (1991). "Beating Murphy's Law." MIT Sloan Management Review 32, no. 3: 5–16.
Lin, T.-Y., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2010). EXPLORING THE KNOWLEDGE NETWORK OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCE RESEARCH: A CO-CITATION ANALYSIS. 8(2), 9.
Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418. doi: 10.2307/3003464
March, J. and H. Simon (1958). Organizations. Wiley, New York.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1) 71–87.
McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.
Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I, Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 586-59.
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer: Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77–91. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171108
Nath, R., & Jackson, W. M. (1991). Productivity of management information systems researchers: Does Lotka’s law apply? Information Processing & Management, 27(2–3), 203–209. doi: 10.1016/0306-4573(91)90049-R
Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, pp. 14-37.
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, UK.
Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538–550. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.5.538.15204
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009). The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management-1980-2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 27(3), 185–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK.
Ramos-Rodríguez, A.-R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of theStrategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004. doi: 10.1002/smj.397
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240. doi: 10.2307/3556658
Reed, R., & Defillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88. doi: 10.2307/258107
Rice, R. E. and E. M. Rogers (1980). 'Reinvention in the innovation process'. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(4), pp. 499-514.
Schuller, M. (2014). Stickiness in knowledge transfer. In H. Hasan (Eds.), Being Practical with Theory: A Window into Business Research (pp. 61-63). Wollongong, Australia: THEORI. https://eurekaconnection.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/p-61-63-stickiness-in-knowledge-theory-theori-ebook_finaljan2014-v3.pdf
Serra, F., Ferreira, M., Guerrazzi, L., & Scaciotta, V. (2018). Doing Bibliometric Reviews for the Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management. Iberoamerican Journal Of Strategic Management (IJSM), 17(3), 01-16. doi:10.5585/riae.v17i3.2713.
Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988-2008): Intellectual Structure of Innovation Research (1988-2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 62–93. doi: 10.1002/smj.2002
Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595-623. Retrieved December 18, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094131
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630240406
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm: Exploring Internal Stickiness. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171105
Szulanski, G. (2000). The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9–27. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2884
Szulanski, G. (2003). Sticky knowledge: Barriers to knowing in the firm. London: Sage.
Szulanski, G., Cappetta, R., & Jensen, R. J. (2004). When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity. Organization Science, 15(5), 600–613. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0096
Szulanski, G., Ringov, D., & Jensen, R. J. (2016). Overcoming Stickiness: How the Timing of Knowledge Transfer Methods Affects Transfer Difficulty. Organization Science, 27(2), 304–322. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2016.1049
Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, Clusters, and Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 258. doi: 10.2307/20159032
Teece, D. J. (1977). Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How. The Economic Journal, 87(346), 242. doi: 10.2307/2232084
Tolbert, P. S. (1988). Institutional sources of organizational culture in major law firms [Electronic version]. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 101-113). Boston: Ballinger Press.
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. doi: 10.2307/3069443
Tyre, M. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations. Organization Science, 5(1), 98–118. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.98
Urbizagástegui Alvarado, R. (2002). A Lei de Lotka na bibliometria brasileira. Ciência da Informação, 31(2), 14–20. doi: 10.1590/S0100-19652002000200002
Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2012). The Dynamic Capability View in Strategic Management: A Bibliometric Review: DCV in Strategic Management. International Journal of Management Reviews, n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12000
von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert systems with applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as Strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.6.730.10084
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review. 27 (2), 185-203.
Zaltman. G., R. Duncan and J. Holbek (1973). Innovations and Organizations. Wiley, New York.
Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1) 76–92.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629
How to Cite
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html