Prioritizing Stakeholders in Project Management: Application of the Multicritery Hierarchy Analysis Method - AHP
Keywords:Stakeholders, Project management, Multicriteria Analysis, Stakeholder Theory
Objective of the study: this article aims to propose a hierarchy of criteria for the classification of stakeholders in Information Technology (IT) projects.
Methodology: The prioritization method used is the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) methodology in order to propose a ranking based on predefined criteria that may have its relevance adjusted according to the project's characteristics. Factors related to the attributes of power, legitimacy, urgency, interest, influence and impact of stakeholders in the projects were considered, investigating a sample of 53 project managers.
Originality / Relevance: The use of the stakeholder approach and the AHP method provide a tool for prioritizing stakeholders in IT projects.
Main results: In the evaluation of criteria that need more attention in management, it was found that stakeholders with Power, Legitimacy and Influence are the ones that usually demand more attention from project managers, thus leaving the criteria of Urgency, Interest and Impact as lower relevance.
Methodological contributions: a method is presented that can be used and suitable for each project according to its environment and characteristics, making the classification of stakeholders to be customized and based on comparisons and not on perceptions.Contributions to management: refers to the improvement of the ability to classify stakeholders in IT projects, presenting a proposal to prioritize actions with the most critical stakeholders, suggesting a method for ordering that will facilitate the performance of the management team in cases of many people with a high probability of impacting or being impacted by the project.
Archibald, R. D. (2005) Os propósitos e Métodos da Categorização Prática de Projeto. Revista Mundo PM. São Paulo, n. 05, p. 28-38, Out/Nov.
Elias, A. A., Cavana, R. Y. & Jackson, L. S. (2002). Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management, v.32, n.4, p.301-310.
Gonçalves, V; Campos, C. (2016). HCMBOK – Human Change Managment Body of Knowledge, 1. ed. CRC Press.
Guedes, A.D. L.; Mendes, S. P. (2005). Gerenciamento de stakeholders: uma contribuição à otimização do papel dos stakeholders, da gerência de conversas e do ciclo de coordenação de ações em projetos de TI. Mundo Project Management, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Mundo, ano 1, n.5, p. 66-73, out./nov.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. (2017). The new story of business: Towards a more responsible capitalism. Business and Society Review, 122(3), 449-465.
Friedman, A. L. & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment, 409(19), 3578-3594.
Jugdev, K.; Müller, R. A (2005). retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Management Institute.
Kerzner, H. (2010). Gestão de Projetos: as melhores práticas. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Mascena, K. M. C.; Kim, J. Fischmann, A. A.; Corrêa, H. (2015). Priorização de Stakeholders: Contribuição dos estudos teóricos e empíricos. Revista de Administração da UFSM, v. 8, p. 42-59.
Mascena, K. M. C. D., Fischmann, A. A., & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2018). Stakeholder Prioritization in Brazilian Companies Disclosing GRI Reports. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 15(1), 17-32.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, v.22, n.4, p.853-886.
PMBOK. (2017). Guia PMBOK®: Um Guia para o Conjunto de Conhecimentos em Gerenciamento de Projetos. PMI - Project Management Institute. 6. ed. Pennsylvania: PMI, 2017.
PMBOK. (2013). Guia PMBOK®: Um Guia para o Conjunto de Conhecimentos em Gerenciamento de Projetos. PMI - Project Management Institute. 5. ed. Pennsylvania: PMI, 2013.
Saaty, T. L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2), 557-570.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision-making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
Sarturi, G., Mascena, K. M. C., Boaventura, J. M. G., & Pilli, L. E. (2018). Relação entre Saliência de Stakeholders e Desempenho Financeiro. Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 21(2), 214-230.
Stocker, F., Arruda, M. P., Mascena, K. M. C. & Boaventura, J.M.G. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: a classification model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 1–10.
Stocker, F., Villar, E. G., Roglio, K. de D., & Abib, G. (2018). Dismissal: Important criteria in managerial decision-making. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 58(2), 116-129.
Stocker, F., Mascena, K., Azevedo, A., & Boaventura, J. (2019). Teoria de Redes de Influências de Stakeholders: uma abordagem revisitada. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 17(SI), 673-688.
Stocker, F., & de Mascena, K. M. C. (2019). Orientação e gestão para stakeholders no processo de decisão organizacional. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 10(1), 167-191.
Wood, D. J., Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Bryan, L. M. (2018). Stakeholder Identification and Salience After 20 Years: Progress, Problems, and Prospects. Business & Society. 1-50.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Professional Business Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html